RE: Mines, detection of
From: jatkins6@i... (John Atkinson)
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 21:29:06 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: RE: Mines, detection of
You wrote:
>Around dusk they'd fly over a suspected or known minefield in a
>helicopter. Scanning the ground with an IR scope, certain mines would
>show up due too the difference in temperatures between the mines and
the >cooling ground around them.
That 'some' makes me nervous. :) But then again I'm a nervous kinda
guy. SGLI is all well and good in theory, but I don't want my next o'
kin to find out how good it is in practice, capice?[1] I think I
permitted mine detectors in VTOLs, flying low and slow. If not I
should have.
>Sheep herds would be used. Bad for sheep, but better a dead sheep
than >a dead person. They would literally drive a sheep herd over a
field and >see if anything was tripped.
Good method, but has the major disadvantage that if your enemy has a
large-caliber machine gun overwatching the minefield (as he should). .
. Not really practical in combat, I'd say.
>The coolest thing about these methods is the mix of low tech and high
>tech.
When it all comes down, there is still no substitute for a sapper with
a stick, probing carefully once every inch.
[1]SGLI, Serviceman's Group Life Insurance, the only life insurance
policy that specifically covers acts of war.
John M. Atkinson