Prev: RE: Kra'vak Railgun Next: ConQuest'98 FT results (was RE: Kra'vak Railgun)

Re: Kra'vak Railgun

From: PCARON <Pcaron@c...>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 21:02:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Kra'vak Railgun

> No, I didn't find them just a _little_ out of balance :-) I can't find
my
> notes right now (they're probably buried under a ton of other gaming
> stuff...), but IIRC they work better with a Mass of (Class+1) - ie,
Class 1
> RGs have Mass 2, Class 2 have Mass 3, etc.
> 
> Later,
> 
> Oerjan Ohlson
> 

I tried that and it seemed to work well.  I'm expanding the number of
weapon systems and wanted to add variety to the "projectile"
technologies
(Railguns, scatterguns).  So I'm adding Autoguns, close range multi-arc
systems.

Glad other players are mucking around with the point/mass cost of
railguns.  I don't feel alone... (this is FT afterall, I'm sure it's
written somewhere that under no circumstances are you to leave the
system
mass and costs intact :)

Pete

Prev: RE: Kra'vak Railgun Next: ConQuest'98 FT results (was RE: Kra'vak Railgun)