Re: Assembling NAC

>Speaking of assembly,
>Did anyone else mount the Invensible class Lt Fleet Carrier with the
deck to
>the aft? 
>
>My reasoning is this: 
>There are two openings to the hanger decks. One facing the deck. And
one open
>to space. Ships being launched would not need a deck to launch. But a
deck to
>land on would be a benefit (especially if you are low on fuel and could
grab
>it with a magnetic grappel). Trying to land in a tunnel in a
potentially
>damaged fighter does not thrill me. It seems to make more sense to
launch
>fighters to the fore (thus gaining the momentum of the carrier), so I
place
>the deck to the rear.
>-- 
>Brian Bell
>pdga6560@csi.com
>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pdga6560/fthome.html

This is one of the great things about SF models (at least those that
aren't
copies of things in films or TV)  - no-one can tell you there is a right
or
wrong way for them to look! A lot of the FT models (not just the
Kra'Vak)
can be assembled in a number of ways, and we're quite happy for people
to
do this.

Jon (GZG)