RE: house rules/offline

On Friday, October 17, 1997 2:12 PM, Roger Burton West 
[SMTP:roger@firedrake.demon.co.uk] wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Chris McCurry wrote:
Status: RO

>
> >I like the idea, and it is realistic but I don't think that because
the
> >ship is fast and the bigs are big that they should be totaly
uneffective.
> >I believe that greatly lowering the chance of a successful hit is a
better
> >than making the larger gun worthless.
>
>

If you look at wet navy history a ship like Bismark was
deadly to escorts and destroyers as well as to Hood.

In one destoyer attack a salvo from Bismark totalled
a destoyer and the others were very wary. In the
future fire control is likely to be better even for the
bif stuff.

sincerely
tim jones
--
The stars are matter, We're matter, But it doesn't matter.