Prev: Re: Internet Message Next: Re: Susan is lazy

Re: Internet Message

From: Doug_Evans/CSN/UNEBR@U...
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 23:59:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Internet Message

Status: RO

Actually, Allan(and you haven't killed me yet for misspelling your
name?!?!?), we in the US are much more interested these days in Princess
Wales. OJ is pretty much a breakfast drink, once again.

As to the letter, it IS a chain letter after all, and whether money is
involved or not, very much frowned upon by most ISP's. To post to a
maillist compounds the horror.

I wasn't much interested in being the avenging angel this time. Did
else contact Prodigy to have the account quashed?

The_Beast on 10/08/97 10:24:31 PM

Please respond to

cc:    (bcc: Doug Evans/CSN/UNEBR)
Subject:  Re: Internet Message

On Wed,  8 Oct 1997 20:46:43, -0500, (MR DAVID E
PETERS) wrote:
>      Here is something funny for the list.
Um, uh, this doesn't have anything to do with games period, let alone
FT, DS2 or SG2. It's not even an off topic science message spawned
from a game thread.
Normally I'm pretty tolerant of off topic stuff (some of you would say
too tolerant) but 410 lines of attribution for 65 lines of bad Seuss
parody? And an OJ joke at that? You Americans really ought to get over
this OJ thing. (And don't get me started about the Brits and Di!)

Allan Goodall  -
"The secret rules of engagement are hard to endorse,
 when the appearance of conflict meets the appearance of force"
		       - The Tragically Hip

Prev: Re: Internet Message Next: Re: Susan is lazy