Prev: Re: Star Trek background (was... something else) Next: Star Trek background (was... something else)

Re: FT Ship Designations - OU/NAC

From: Alan E & Carmel J Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 02:59:24 -0400
Subject: Re: FT Ship Designations - OU/NAC

Phillip Atcliffe wrote:
>
> As far as republic vs monarchy goes, I regret to say that I have to
agree. Given
> Jon's future history, the OU, as a separate nation from the NAC, would
be highly
> unlikely to be anything other than a republic.

Concur. Unless, of course, the NAC de-installed the Mountbatten-Windsors
in favour of the Spencers. In which case we might pick up some
slightly-used monarchs, one careless owner.

> Phil, an ex-pat royalist Aussie

Alan, a pat royalist Aussie (and part-time Pom)
-- 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au  o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		    By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale

Prev: Re: Star Trek background (was... something else) Next: Star Trek background (was... something else)