Prev: RE: Superships and Fighter capacity. Next: Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...)

RE: SG - Confidence Levels

From: "Glover, Owen" <oglover@m...>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:16:32 -0400
Subject: RE: SG - Confidence Levels

Well thanks for those that have responded so far (Daric Morris and Barry
Cadwgan), two similar but opposing views?! I think I'll continue playing
the worst factor for the time being. 

> ----------
> From: 	jrmintz@juno.com[SMTP:jrmintz@juno.com]
> Sent: 	Tuesday, 8 July 1997 4:31
> To:	FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject:	Re: SG - Confidence Levels
> 
> 
> >Glover, Owen wrote:
> >> 
> >> I think we've been playing Cl checks a little wrong; we do teh CL
> >> check
> >> with the highest or worst factor at the time of a given check
> >> requirement.
> >> 
> No, you've been doing it right.  The rules are pretty clear on that. 
> Choose the highest factor that is merely a number.  And factors that
> have
> are in the form of +X add to your base number.  So if you are shot and
> suppressed for the first time, two line troopers die, and your squad
> leader bites it, you only test for the squad leader dying since it is
> the
> highest number.  It seems kinda odd to me as well.
> 
> -Bite The Wax Tadpole-
> 
> Daric (jrmintz@juno.com) Morris
> 

Prev: RE: Superships and Fighter capacity. Next: Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...)