Re: FT Armor
From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 02:37:57 -0400
Subject: Re: FT Armor
Michael Brown wrote:
>
> I've been re-thinking armor and Kra'Vak systems for the last few
weeks. This is
> what I have come up with:
>
> 1: Armor does not protect against beam weapons (or anything else that
sheilds
> prtect against).
> 2: Armor is shown by 50% more damage boxes. Costs for armor remain
the same,
> however crusiers pay for armor level 1, capital ships always pay for
armor level
> 2. (ie armored crusiers and capital ships get 2 damage boxes per 3
mass)
>
> This has not been play tested, but I think it will work. Let me know
what you
> think.
>
> Michael Brown
>
> PS I've worked up a set of mission cards (MS Word) to quickly
generate
> scenarios. If you are interested I can send you a zip file
What was this about a set of mission cards in MS Word?
I am interested if you are willing to send me a copy of the file too?
How extensive are they?
Thanks
Donald Hosford