Prev: Re: Missles? Next: Re: Capital vs. others Debate

Re: Missles?

From: "johnjmedway" <jjm@z...>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 17:56:42 -0500
Subject: Re: Missles?

On Apr 2, 17:35, Joachim Heck - SunSoft wrote:
> Subject: Re: Missles?
>   Seriously while I think exploding missiles should be at best an
> optional rule, I do like the idea.  Our group toyed with the idea of

The idea of it desgtroying the missile rack beyond the ability of a
damage
control party to fix sounds perfectly fine, but other than that, the
exploding
fuel shouldn't do all than much. Not unless you believe that hitting
something
in a hangar would blow the holding ship apart. I'd be fine for having it
scotch
the hangar beyond repair, but more than that seems questionable.

> hangar explosions and fire on board carriers but we eventually decided

The fire on board the carrier reminds me of that entirely too dim for
words
Battlestar Galactica with the massive fire abord the ship. Sure, a fire
could
become pretty big, if you were dim enough to leave all the bulkheads
open. But
there's always one easy way to put it out in space...

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|  john_medway@zycor.lgc.com  |  Landmark Graphics Corp  |  512.292.2325
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|		 "I am not a user. I am a human being." 		
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Prev: Re: Missles? Next: Re: Capital vs. others Debate