Prev: Re: campaigns Next: FW: Bigger not always better--Take 2

RE: GZG questions

From: The Caldwells <clcaldwell@p...>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 11:34:07 -0500
Subject: RE: GZG questions


OK - So this leads to a bunch more questions: :-)

1) What does a KV look like?  18 legs? 6 eyes? Armored? Fur? Tiny?
Large?

2) What is a P'taah? And what do they look like?

Thanks,

Nick Caldwell, still waiting for Star Tigers on the other side of the
pond
clcaldwell@primary.net

----------
From:	Ground Zero Games[SMTP:jon@gzero.dungeon.com]
Sent:	Friday, March 28, 1997 2:17 AM
To:	FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
Subject:	Re: GZG questions

>
>5. The Kra'vak are re-released, how compatible are they with the old 
>figures ? 

Not very - the old KV were very oversized and a bit crude, the new ones
match the human figs better. Appearance and uniforms are similar, but
weapons are all new designs. 
>
>6. With the re-release of the Kra'vak and the release of the P'taah
(sp?) 
>are we likely to see the aliens supplement this year ? and will it also

>have the Kryomek listed as they were in SG I ?

The aliens supplement will be out as soon as I can get it written, but
other things (like the FT fleet book, FTII, FMA etc) keep getting in the
way. No, the Kryomek won't be in it (they were actually not in SG1
either -
the guy who did the weapons manual for me just put in some "generic
aliens
with bioweapons"...)
>
>
>7. The NSL carrier is described as a modified SDN, what is the physical

>diference between these models as the catalogue (and Geo-Hex photos)
does 
>not make this clear ?

The only real difference is the carrier has an additional "bay" under
the
main spar that joins the fore and aft hull sections, which is the
fighter
storage area. We have a side view in the new '97 catalogue (UK) which
makes
this clearer.
>
>Stuart.
>b.s.murray@ncl.ac.uk

Jon (GZG)

Prev: Re: campaigns Next: FW: Bigger not always better--Take 2