Re: The Ft FAQ!/Odd Thrust

On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, John Crimmins wrote:

>	  Has this really been a subjuect for debate?  We've always
simply
> split the move in half, like the 2.5 & 2.5 split you mention above. 
No
> offense, I'm just curious, but why would you do it any other way?  Why
> complicate things?

Because the rules do cover this (ie, odd thrust point goes to the second

'half' of the move, both for turning and acceleration)? I'm almost
certain 
that's in the FT basic rules...

Oerjan Ohlson

"Father, what is wrong?"
"My shoes are too tight. But it does not matter, because
 I have forgotten how to dance."
- Londo Mollari