Re: Conventional DS2?
From: "Nick Meredith" <nickm@d...>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:12:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Conventional DS2?
On 21 Nov 96 at 9:44, Cleyne, Daniel wrote:
> > And THANK YOU for the Firefly mention! The UK and Canada made good
use of
> > what was considered the best Sherman variant. I heard that politics
> stopped
> > the US from adopting the Sherman.
>
> The Firefly didn't have a HE round and was thus limited severely in
its use
> against soft targets and infantry. Perhaps that was one of the reasons
the
> Americans didn't want it.
Don't forget that the British had long used a close support variant
in the Squadron HQ (105mm howitzer IIRC) to provide the HE support.
Also, at 1 Firefly in 4 tanks ost of the time the other 3 could look
after the infantry while the Firefly looked after the enemy tanks.
It all appears to come down to a matter of choice - specialisation or
generalisation, but I suspect that another reason may have been the
spuuly of 17dr guns and munitions. To introduce these into US
production would have been a major change, whereas the long 75 & 76mm
guns were a much smaller change.
--
Cheers
Nick Meredith - nickm@discover.co.uk - Coventry, UK