Re: Variant PDAF/ADAF Rules
From: JAMES BUTLER <JAMESBUTLER@w...>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 01:02:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Variant PDAF/ADAF Rules
At 05:15 PM 11/14/96 +0000, you wrote:
>>Both can engage ships within their range and roll one die.
>> Target unshielded - 5,6 hits for 1 damage point
>> Target level 1 shield/armour - 6 hits for 1 damage point
>
>I don't know that I'd give them armor/shield piercing capability;
>a shield or an armored hull should be proof against the wimpy little
>charges that [PA]DAF's use. (Unless you're playing a hard SF game,
>which this is not, and base the damage on kinetic energy.) And the
>small ships that you mention are too small to be shielded, and usually
>don't get armor.
>
Wasn't there a similar concept (PDAF/ADAF having an anti-ship
ability) in the latest B5 FT adaptations? I don't remember what the rule
was
but it seemed like a good idea when I read it.
Not that it has anything to do with anything but I also thought
the
inertialess drives idea from the B5 FT adaptations would be a good
addition
to Star Trek FT as warp drives are inertialess.
Outta here,
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
___
|[|]|
|[|]|
/|[|]|\ _______ __ // //
_ _ /==|[|]|==\(_______)/ \__[__]__[__]__MMMMMMMMMM\
[_|_|\%%===[|]====(_______)| |===================HHHHHH\
[_|_| %%===[|]====(_______)| |=X=X=X==X=X=X======HHHHHHH]
[_|_| %%==========(_______)\__/ }C=K@ WWWWWWWWWW/
[_|_|/
}C=K@
|_____||__________||_________||____________||___________|
Main Bridge/ Fuel/ Weapons/ Scanners/
Drive Quarters Jump Drive Ship's Boats Spinal Mount
Battlecruiser INTREPID, CORMORANT-class
Captain James L. Butler III, Commanding
JAMESBUTLER@worldnet.att.net