Re: More future history questions

>G'day,
>
>Thanks for the responses.
>
>I would have to agree that I found the book constraining and very 
>one-eyed, ignoring whole ranges of alternatives. On the hobby front 
>I enjoyed the Years of Rice and Salt much more (and it was openly 
>sold as science fiction).
>
>I've had to read a whole heap of futurist journals and stuff of late 
>and all I can say is that any of you could probably do a better job 
>than the majority of the guys who do it for a living (especially as 
>they never seem to go back and check where they went wrong) -	so if 
>you're ever in need of a book deal idea just relabel yourself as a 
>strategic adviser....
>
>Thanks
>
>Beth

Hehehe! So, Beth, reckon that between us all we could sell a 
(slightly revised) GZG-verse to these guys? Seems to be as plausible 
as anything else I've read on this thread so far....  ;-)

Best,

Jon (GZG)