Re: More future history questions
From: "KH.Ranitzsch" <kh.ranitzsch@t...>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:54:28 +0100
Subject: Re: More future history questions
Am 15.01.2012 05:04, schrieb Beth.Fulton@csiro.au:
> G'day,
>
> For work I recently read the book "The Next 100 Years" by George
Friedman. I'm not sure I really agree with some of his logic, but the
last few chapters made for an interesting sci-fi short story read.
Haven't read Friedman's book (or anything else by him, except maybe an
article or two), but he has been around for quite some time commenting
on US foreign policy. From comments by others, his predictions seem not
to have been too accurate (but then, whose are?).
> So I'll do a quick summary here (sorry if this counts as spoilers) and
I wouldn't mind getting your opinion on how feasible it all seems.
>
> I won't bother going through all the economic ups and downs he
predicts,
If you want to do future history, demography and economics are the
foundation, so they do deserve attention.
For the given timescale (a few decades) demography is pretty much a
given, though as nations develop, growth may be slower than expected
now. A point that is often overlooked is that China is aging quite
rapidly, too, though it is, still, younger than Japan or Europe. Anotehr
point: countries with a large overhang of young people tend to have more
volatile politics.
As to economics, I think that the ease of modern communications, travel
and trade create a strong trend that skills, infrastructure and living
standards become more and more similar around the globe. There will
still be differences, but nowhere like the differences between
industrial nations and the rest of the world at the beginning of the
20th century. This means that, give or take a factor of 2 or so, GDP per
capita will be similar everywhere and a nations' economic strength will
depend mainly on its working-age population.
By implication, the US will soon fall behind China and India, several
other large countries will rival European Countries and Japan.
Within the timescale, the main problem zone will still be Sub-Saharan
Africa. Not to say there will not be problem spots elsewhere (Haiti,
North Korea, Papua...)
Short of a major Nuclear War, I don't see anything that could stop this
trend to more equal conditions around the globe.
More soon
Karl Heinz