Prev: Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1 Next: Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1

Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1

From: Hugh Fisher <laranzu@o...>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 09:29:51 +1100
Subject: Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1

Oerjan Ariander wrote

>If you want the published designs to make any sense at all in 
>Cinematic, you round down. A single point of accel is not a very big 
>deal, but 5% of TMF and a single point of (Cinematic) turn rate both 
>are.

I missed the implication of this first time through.

So, the published designs (FB1 & 2) *don't make sense* in
FT Lite? Intentionally?

	cheers,
	Hugh

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1 Next: Re: [GZG] FT:XD changes, part 1