Prev: Re: [GZG] Toying with UNSC ships (sendout #2) Next: Re: [GZG] Toying with UNSC ships (sendout #2)

Re: [GZG] SGhouserulesfortheIXx [SEC=PERSONAL]

From: Andy Hemming <nonsense_factory@h...>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:43:48 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] SGhouserulesfortheIXx [SEC=PERSONAL]

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
SG:> Base Armour: d6 (chitin shell)
 
Could they use armor on top of this, are they high tech?, what about
personal force fields on top?
> Base Speed: 8"/d8x2 (better armour slows down as normal)
 
sounds good, (think SG2 needs differentiated movement rules -
particularly for vehicles...)
> Psychology: Solo hunter; Any Ixx that counts as "independant" uses
the> movement/hidden rules for snipers. This also applies to any
detachments> of 1 figure from a squad, or a squad reduced to 1 figure.
 
would welcome further discussion here, like the suggested chemical
communication, but unsure of the ignore the dead idea, I'm thinking they
would be high tech - almost a higher power, so would not be the type who
would be in a SG scenario en masse, but might be a small group
supporting other forces (probably NPC in a campaign I'm planning) - I'm
thinking they'd be detatched from the squabbling between states that the
tuffley verse seems to comprise (apart from the unification that the
Kravak bring) - so would only step in to tip the balance in favour of
their long term goals...
 
 
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:55:42 +1100> From:
Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [GZG] SGhouserulesfortheIXx [SEC=PERSONAL]> > > > SG:> Base
Armour: d6 (chitin shell)> Base Speed: 8"/d8x2 (better armour slows down
as normal)> Psychology: Solo hunter; Any Ixx that counts as
"independant" uses the> movement/hidden rules for snipers. This also
applies to any detachments> of 1 figure from a squad, or a squad reduced
to 1 figure.> > DS:> no thoughts yet.> > FT:> Favour the use of heavy
fighters and small escort ships?> > > Brendan> 'Neath Southern Skies>
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/ > >
________________________________> > From: On Behalf Of Andy Hemming>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:49 PM> Subject: [GZG] SG houserules
for the IXx [TO BE CLASSIFIED]> > Hola all,> > I'm so buying some of
these, and am beginning to wonder how we> should play em, any thoughts?>
> Andy> >
______________________________________________________________________>
IMPORTANT> 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
> 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information > for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, > please contact the sender and delete all copies of this
email. > 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender
and are not > a statement of Australian Government Policy unless
otherwise stated. > 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are
not conspicuous publications > and DVA does not consent to the receipt
of commercial electronic messages. > 5. Please go to
http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails> of this
type from DVA. > 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.> >
_______________________________________________> Gzg-l mailing list>
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu>
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
_________________________________________________________________
See the most popular videos on the web 
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454061/direct/01/

Prev: Re: [GZG] Toying with UNSC ships (sendout #2) Next: Re: [GZG] Toying with UNSC ships (sendout #2)