Prev: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

From: Indy <indy.kochte@g...>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:05:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn
Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Ground Zero Games <jon@gzg.com> wrote:

> >I work at Carnegie Mellon. About 6 months ago, I got in touch with a
> >buddy who's a sys admin at the robotics consortium.	I took my 12
year
> >old son to see the Crusher and it's predecessors, among other robotic
> >delights  It's even cooler than it looks. :)
> >
> >J
>
>
> Interesting article, but no pics that I could see.... anyone have any
> direct links to some pics of this?
>

An image google search on 'crusher vehicle army' returned this:

http://images.google.com/images?q=crusher%20vehicle%20army&ie=UTF-8&oe=u
tf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Amusingly, the first image is of said Crusher crushing a car...

Mk


Prev: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?