Prev: Re: [GZG] Troop potential Next: Re: [GZG] Troop potential

Re: [GZG] FT Light: 5 is the new 6?

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@s...>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:16:21 -0700
Subject: Re: [GZG] FT Light: 5 is the new 6?


On Jul 26, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Bill Brush wrote:

> Man this would be funny if the irony wasn't so painful.  :-)
>
> Back in the day when I was designing a fleet and attendant doctrine I
> was going by the "round up" rule for turns, so I did what I considered
> the most logical thing to do, which was give all my ships an odd
> thrust rating.  When asked about it I said truthfully that I did it to
> get the extra turn as my doctrine was designed for maneuverability,
> and lots of short-range firepower at the expense of no long-range
> firepower.   I was then roundly criticized and castigated for being
> "cheesy", etc, etc, etc.   Not needing any further headaches I pretty
> much shelved my FT plans and moved on to other things.

Consider yourself ahead of your time.

--
Michael Llaneza
maserati@speakeasy.net
415.624.5960

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Troop potential Next: Re: [GZG] Troop potential