Prev: Re: [GZG] GenCon? (was Re: Historicon '08) Next: Re: [GZG] Grossly Off-topic ANZAC Whining

Re: [GZG] FT Light: threshold checks should be high!

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:29:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] FT Light: threshold checks should be high!

>  >Serious answer(s):
>>
>>1) As Ryan says above, high = good has a better feel.
>>
>>2) Simplicity again - threshold roll is directly linked to damage
>>track row number. Much more intuitive. This change was strongly
>>suggested by several members of the test list, and it made sense, so
>>we went with it.
>
>I suggest changing damage control rolls to be under or
>equal to the number of DCPs for the same reason of
>simplicity: 1 DCP succeeds on 1, up to 3 succeed 1-3.

That is exactly what is planned.... we just didn't put the DCP rules 
in FT Light.....  ;-)

Jon (GZG)

>
>As a minor side effect, it will shut me up as well :-)
>
>	cheers,
>	Hugh
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] GenCon? (was Re: Historicon '08) Next: Re: [GZG] Grossly Off-topic ANZAC Whining