Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

From: Samuel Penn <sam@g...>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:47:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

On Sunday 10 February 2008 07:51:18 Eric Foley wrote:
> I see two ways of balancing out bots that are going to ignore morale
and
> suppression.
[...snip examples of suicidal machines...]

But why should they ignore morale and suppression? If they're
just drones with no AI then this makes sense, but if they're
controlled by an AI that is (or almost) as capable as a human,
then it may well have self preservation as an instinct.

As an SF example, the Tachikomas do take cover and try to avoid
being shot.

-- 
Be seeing you,			       http://www.glendale.org.uk
Sam.			    Mail/IM (Jabber): sam@glendale.org.uk 

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?