Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

Re: [GZG] SG-3 Technology Differences

From: "Michael R. Blair" <pellinoire@y...>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] SG-3 Technology Differences



I know this one!



The Great War biplane would probably have a much bigger
radar signature than you would expect. The WW II Mosquito was largely
made from
wood but had a RCS not much less than a metal skinned plane because of
the engines.
However the mozzie probably had metal airscrews which would put the
signature way
up compared with the biplane.



There is an old SF story called 'Hawk Among the Sparrows'
about a modern (apparently based on the YF-12) airplane transported back
to the
Great War. After much fun filtering enough paraffin for a few minutes
flight he
finds its AAMs useless against the Germans but the turbulence generated
by his
planes page is very effective which is all tickety boo until it ingests
some
debris and the engines eat themselves. He ends up flying for the
Lafayette Escadrille
I think. A good story.



Michael

      ___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For
Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?