Prev: Re: [GZG]Delafields Next: Re: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

From: "Magnus Alexandersson" <magnus.alexandersson@g...>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:35:07 +0100
Subject: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

2007/2/22, Damo <damosan@gmail.com>:
>
> On Feb 21, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Roger Books wrote:
>
> >
> > FMA and BDS were being discussed over 5 years ago when I discovered
> > GZG.  IIRC it may well have been 7 years.
> >
>
> There are times when I think a collaborative community approach will
> go a long way towards making FMA and BDS appear before we're all dead.
>
> It's not that hard really -- the open source world has shown that it
> is possible to write much in a collaborative sense.  Once the various
> sets reach publication quality they are simply moved to one of those
> print on demand places.  GZG would, of course, have final say on the
> printable version.
>
> When you get right down to it...who cares more about the rules?  GZG
> or Us?  In the end it's a win/win for everyone.
>
> Damo

You can get alot of collaborative work done with a wiki. If Jon points
in the general direction, others can do the heavy lifting. ;)

/Magnus
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG]Delafields Next: Re: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)