Prev: [GZG] Re: ecc quotes Next: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

From: "Roger Books" <roger.books@g...>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:44:13 -0500
Subject: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI've said this
before, but it can be repeated;

Stop tweaking the rules to death and publish them.  I have talked to
people
that have told me they don't play GZG because it is dead as a publisher
of
games.	How many years has it been since GZG published anything new?

FMA and BDS were being discussed over 5 years ago when I discovered
GZG.  IIRC it may well have been 7 years.

Roger

On 2/20/07, Allan Goodall <agoodall@hyperbear.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/20/07, Jaime Tiampo <fugugaipan@spikyfishthing.com> wrote:
> > Speaking of FMA at EEC.. do we have rules some of us can look at for
it?
> > Something a little bit more refined then the Beta rules for like a
> decade
> > ago? ;-)
>
> Yes... if you're on the playtest list. *S*
>
> Allan
> --
> Allan Goodall 	   http://www.hyperbear.com
> agoodall@hyperbear.com
> awgoodall@gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>


Prev: [GZG] Re: ecc quotes Next: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)