Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
     That is what happened in 1 of our games recently, a FSE squadron
getting 
resupplied with more missiles was jumped at it resupply place.	 While
yes 
the FSE did cause some damage with it's SML while armed, but when
without them, 
they were less well armed then the beam strike squadron sent against
them.	
Of course a spy, gave up the location...
     But those all missile fleets suffer a bit in campaigning becuase
they 
need a "larger support train" then unit using just beams, or even Pulse
Torp.	
Now a Fighter heavy fleet needs a even larger still...

DOCAGREN

Just a Lurker here on the Digest, But maybe I have a good idea or 2..
:-)

In a message dated 12/27/06 3:03:37 PM,
gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu 
writes:

> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:50:37 +1100
> From: Robert N Bryett 
> 
> Given that it was a campaign, how did you model logistics for 
> expendable weapons? Could the "beam" side attack the fleet train
with 
> light units?
> 
> Best regards, Robert Bryett
> rbryett@mail.com
> 
> > In one of our campaigns one of the players built a fleet around 
> > missile technology and was very effective. You jump in force the 
> > enemy to engage, salvo your missiles and then run for it. If the 
> > missiles do the job you can mop up with secondary weapons.
>