Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
From: VinsFullThrust@a...
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:21:18 EST
Subject: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
In a message dated 12/23/2006 11:41:17 AM Eastern Standard Time,
rlbell.nsuid@gmail.com writes:
It got me thinking about how battlecruisers are handled in games.
They are usually ships between a heavy cruiser and a battleship. Only
one navy (the USN) ever built ships like that, and they were called
"Large Cruisers" (the Alaska class). All ships that were actually
called battlecruisers were as large as, if not larger, than
battleships. The HMS Hood, a battlecruiser, was the largest warship
in the world, until the Bismark was completed. Battlecruisers were
basically dreadnoughts that exchanged weight of armor for weight of
machinery to get an extra turn of speed. The only game that ever got
this right was Starfire, as a BC was faster than a BB and if it
accepted less protection, it could mount the same armament.
OK, maybe I am lost here. Hood was smaller the bismark, yet Hood was a
"cruiser" and Bismark was "battleship." If this is accurate and Hood
and Bismark
were the worlds largest "warships" What exactly does that make Yamato
and
Musashi that were nearly 2 times larger then Bismark?
Vince