Prev: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted) Next: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)

Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:51:03 -0600
Subject: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

Probably right, though might have to go to StarGrunt, just to be sure.
;->=

As you point out, if you work hard, you can find SOMETHING to be naughty
about....

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 11/03/2006 08:33:08 AM:

> >S-AC works, tho' expect derogatory 'sack of...' comments;
>
> SG, not S, so SG:AC should be fine. We just have to hope
> that people spell out "Assault Co" instead of shortening
> it by four letters.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted) Next: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)