Prev: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted) Next: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

From: <laserlight@v...>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:33:08 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

>S-AC works, tho' expect derogatory 'sack of...' comments;

SG, not S, so SG:AC should be fine. We just have to hope that people
spell out "Assault Co" instead of shortening it by four letters.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted) Next: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)