Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l>On 11/2/06, Ground
Zero Games <<mailto:jon@gzg.com>jon@gzg.com> wrote:
>
>  >That's not the point. It's not simply a matter of basing - I want a
game
>>where the basic element is a team, not an individual figure.
>
>
>The direction in which I'm thinking is:
>[...]
>
>Is this the sort of level that most folks (assuming an interest in
>15mm at all) are interested in?
>
>
>Adding in my two bits: yes. 
>
>
>Mk

Thanks for all the responses so far; maybe I should have done this in 
the first place, but  if it's not too late let's turn this into a 
mini-survey: I'd like as many listers as possible (yes, that means 
you lurkers too!) to respond to this - go on, it'll only take you a 
couple of moments!

1) Do you (or have you in recent years) play SG2?
a) Yes, with 25/28mm minis
b) Yes, with 15mm minis but using standard SG2 - ie: single-based
figures
c) Yes, with 15mm minis but modified for group-based figures
d) No, interested but have no opponents/time/money etc...
e) No, not interested

2) Would the development of a game like we've been discussing (let's 
call it SG3) fit what you would want from a hard SF ground combat 
game?
a) Yes, and I'd play it in 15mm
b) Yes, but I'd still play it in 25/28mm (or 6mm, or anything else!)
c) No, this level of game doesn't interest me

3) Would the development of SG3 in this direction tempt you into 
buying/collecting 15mm forces?
a) Yes, I'd buy a new 15mm army!
b) I already have a 15mm force waiting for a game system...
c) No, I've got enough lead/scale/projects already!

For all questions, feel free to add an "other" option (and 
discuss...) if none of those supplied really fits!

Over to you all....

Jon (GZG)

>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l