Re: [GZG] Re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lAs far as I can
tell long range fire suppresses, but close assaults decide
battles.  As far as I am concerned a close assault is the only way to
remove an entrenched enemy.

I'd have to check, but does a suppressed squad get fire if the
assaulting
squad fails its'  movement roll?

Roger

On 9/15/06, Glenn M. Goffin <gmgoffin@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Posted by: "hundvighong" hundvighong@yahoo.com   hundvighong
>
> >Although it's even more a "morale" game in my book. Suppressing the
> >enemy and shaking his confidence is often more important than sheer
> >body count. Close assaults are great at demoralizing the enemy and
> >forcing him out of good positions, but they're also really risky
> >most of the time. Shooting is generally a slower, but safer way to
> >break your opponent.
> >
> >That said, if you're badly outgunned, a desperate close assault can
> >sometimes turn things around...or, more likely, end your misery
> >quickly. :)
>
> Remember that artillery is your friend.  Call it early and often.
>
> --Glenn
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>