RE: [GZG] [FT]ModernNaval? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I'd treat the *boom* chit as normal (but maybe remove half of them from
the
bag).  
Lucky hits against magazines etc are still possible; the main hull
compartmentalization is the leading issue of how to model (thinking some
more, maybe size 10 hull sections to show compartments - but then
mobility
damage etc needs some thinking about). 

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Books
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT]ModernNaval? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> 
> How would you deal with a BOOM chit?
> 
> I'd run FT movement and weapon arcs and use the rest of the 
> combat from DS.
> One good missile strike can cripple a carrier.  If I wanted 
> survivability I'd raise the armour.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> On 8/16/06, Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> 
>	I have seen many attempts over the years, none of them 
> really succeeded on
>	their own to get the right feel.
>	
>	My feeling is that modern naval combat really need a 
> mix of both FT and DS.
>	Movement from FT and a mixed DS/FT combat system. 
>	
>	Example:
>	Destroyer
>	Mass 30 (= 30 total DS size)
>	Size 15 Main Hull (1/2 total size) = motive system costs etc
>	Size 5 Forward Turret (Superior FCS + 2 x Size 5 HVC)
>	Size 5 Aft Missile Battery (ZAD + 3 x Sup Heavy missiles) 
>	Size 5 Helideck (Size 3 VTOL)
>	
>	Build each part as a separate DS vehicle.  In combat, 
> weapons can be
>	targetted against each section.
>	One option with the main hull is to divide it into size 
> 5 sections and when 
>	more than half of them are destroyed, the ship sinks.
>	
>	This would give the right "feel" and should work from 
> pre-dreadnought
>	through to modern.  Going to make for *very* expensive 
> vehicles from a
>	points POV, but that's just a scaling thing.
>	
>	
>	Brendan
>	'Neath Southern Skies
>	http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/
>	
>	> -----Original Message----- 
>	> From:  Damond Walker
>	> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:10 PM
>	> Subject: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?
>	>
>	> Hey All,
>	>
>	> I'm toying around with hacking together a version of FT for 
>	> use with Modern Naval gaming.  Has anyone done anything along
>	> these lines?
>	>
>	> The trouble, as I see it, is to come up with a model for the
>	> BILLIONS of various radars and sonars used by naval forces 
>	> today.  I want to keep things cinematic but I also want to
>	> capture detection of opposing forces.
>	>
>	> I've thought about using an opposed roll.  Once detected the
>	> vessel stays detected throughout the game. 
>	>
>	> OR there is the option of just BAGGING IT.  Assume detection
>	> and game on.
>	>
>	> Damo
>	
>	IMPORTANT
>	1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
>	2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain 
> confidential 
>	information
>	   for the intended recipient. If you are not the 
> intended recipient,
>	   please contact the sender and delete all copies of 
> this email.
>	3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
> sender and are not 
>	   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless 
> otherwise stated.
>	4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not 
> conspicuous
>	publications
>	   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of 
> commercial electronic 
>	messages.
>	5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub 
> to unsubscribe emails
>	
>	   of this type from DVA.
>	6. Finally, please do not remove this notice. 
>	
>	_______________________________________________
>	Gzg-l mailing list
>	Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>	http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l 
> <http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l> 
>	
> 
> 
> 

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l