Prev: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update Next: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update

Re: [GZG] [DSII] Vehicle desgn question

From: "Roger Books" <roger.books@g...>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:54:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] [DSII] Vehicle desgn question

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lThanks,

Trying not to violate the spirit or the letter of the rules.

Roger

On 6/20/06, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@telia.com> wrote:
>
> Roger Books wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to design an MICV for use in both Stargrunt abd Dirtside. 
I
> want
> >to carry 8 spaces of troops, have a class 2 DFFG, and have the
default
> APSW
> >replaced by one that can be remote controlled so it still functions
when
> the
> >vehicle is surpressed.
> >
> >Does this violate the max of three weapons on a size class 3 vehicle?
> >(DFFG, remote APSW, 2 units of infantry).
>
> Nope. DS2 p.11 explicitly states both that the "free" APSW does not
count
> towards the maximum number of weapons AND that it is "on an external
> remote
> mounting", so your vehicle is perfectly legal in DS2.
>
> As far as I can see SG2 doesn't specify any maximum number of weapons;
the
> only limit appears to be the capacity used. Since you're using 15
capacity
> points (assuming a turreted DFFG/2, otherwise it'd be less) in a
Size/3
> vehicle, I reckon the vehicle is legal in SG2 as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Oerjan
> oerjan.ariander@telia.com
>
> "Life is like a sewer.
>   What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
> -Hen3ry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>


Prev: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update Next: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] Revised Salvo Missiles Update