Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26
From: Tony Christney <tchristney@t...>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:27:57 -0800
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26
Definitely not talking about geosynchronous satellites. Their orbits
are much too
high to be effective at surveillance, i.e. sub 2 meter photography.
Tony C.
On 8-Mar-06, at 2:19 PM, Glenn Wilson wrote:
> UAVs and satellites fulfill different functions. Also, are we
talking
> geosynchronous (spelling) satellites?
>
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l