Prev: Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships Next: Re: [GZG] FMA skirmish

Re: [GZG] DSIII q

From: "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@c...>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:36:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

> 
> Grant,
> 
> I think that your comments are very constructive - especially when
they 
> are mapped to "what works in a convention setting?"  I purposely left
out 
> most of the artillery (the base defenders had two mortar teams, but
they 
> were only good against deployed infantry, and I don't think that the 
> K'hiff ever did deploy them!).
> 
> As to my mistakes with the rules, I must admit the combination of
weekly 
> changes and modifications and too little sleep definitely had a
negative 
> impact on my ability to keep things straight.  As OA pointed out to me
in 
> a seprate mailing, the changes that have been made in the last 6
months 
> actualy contribute to me NOT knowing what I'm doing 'cause I mix up
what 
> is with what used to be.
> 
> On that note, I'm gonna try something completely different for ECCX.
:)
> 
> J
> 

   No problems John.  Mistakes in beta-testing are probably beneficial! 
:-)

   I have to admit that I've very curious as to how the artillery blends
into
 firefights.

  grant

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships Next: Re: [GZG] FMA skirmish