Re: [GZG] DSIII q
From: "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@c...>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:36:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] DSIII q
>
> Grant,
>
> I think that your comments are very constructive - especially when
they
> are mapped to "what works in a convention setting?" I purposely left
out
> most of the artillery (the base defenders had two mortar teams, but
they
> were only good against deployed infantry, and I don't think that the
> K'hiff ever did deploy them!).
>
> As to my mistakes with the rules, I must admit the combination of
weekly
> changes and modifications and too little sleep definitely had a
negative
> impact on my ability to keep things straight. As OA pointed out to me
in
> a seprate mailing, the changes that have been made in the last 6
months
> actualy contribute to me NOT knowing what I'm doing 'cause I mix up
what
> is with what used to be.
>
> On that note, I'm gonna try something completely different for ECCX.
:)
>
> J
>
No problems John. Mistakes in beta-testing are probably beneficial!
:-)
I have to admit that I've very curious as to how the artillery blends
into
firefights.
grant
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l