RE: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lElite or highly
motivated crews - the cost would have to worked somehow
as currently crew quality and morale are not tracked separately when
designing ships or scenarios.



--Binhan



________________________________

From: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Ian Downing
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:56 PM
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Re: [GZG] John's Shipbuilding



But how would morale rules cope with situations such as the Glowworm v
Hipper, Jervis Bay v Scheer, Rawalpindi V Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. The
RN ships had no chance of winning, only the Glowworm got some return on
her sacrifice by damaging the Hipper so she required several months
dockyard repairs. So how would you model this in FT?

Ian

damosan@comcast.net wrote:

	From: John Tailby 
	
	> 
	> Would introducing a morale system into FT be worthwhile? 
	> 
	
	I'd be all for this as an add-on rule. You can get into a few
hairy situations though: once morale cracks will the ship try to run
away? Jump out? Surrender to the opposing side?
	
	
	--
	Damo
	_______________________________________________
	Gzg-l mailing list
	Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
	http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



________________________________

To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/security_centre/*http:/
uk.security.yahoo.com/> .