Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt]
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@h...>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:56:51 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt]
On 1/4/06, gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
<gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:46:32 -0600
> From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@horusinc.com>
> Subject: RE: [GZG] [Stargrunt]
> I've played it with anything from fire-teams to company sized
engagements, a
> couple of platoons on each side seems to work best.
Unfortunately, as Beth has pointed out in the past, the SG2 Confidence
Test system works best with only 1 platoon per side. Otherwise it's
not nasty enough.
Two platoons per side works best, but this is kind of an odd size:
bigger than a platoon, but not a full company. It's probably my
biggest (of several) complaints I have about SG2.
--
Allan Goodall http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@hyperbear.com
awgoodall@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l