RE: Fighters....Re: Full Thrust vs Starmada

I generally use the CEF rules and usually found by the time they ran out
of
endurance, I had also run out of fighters.  The attrition factor comes
into
play over several turns.
Sure, I nuke the first target and usually the second, but by the time
the
thrid & fourth targets get attacked, a lot of the squadrons are down to
1/2
strength (and the attack or torpedo squadrons are all gone).

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Indy
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:28 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Fighters....Re: Full Thrust vs Starmada
> 
> With all these suggestions about putting limitations on fighters, I've
> got a random question for the general populace: how many 
> people do or do
> not use the CEF rule with fighters? I can see where if one 
> opted to not
> keep track of this fighters are essentially an infinite-use 
> weapon (hence
> why it was adopted). Maybe limitations or other caps can or 
> should be put
> on CEFs?

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.