Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:28:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL
At 3:53 PM -0500 1/31/05, Grant A. Ladue wrote:
> >
>> >No fixed set of defenses is going to be sufficient against an
opponent
>> that can just continue to attack with impunity.
>>
>> There is no impunity--at a minimum, he's still laying out the cash
for
>> munitions and the logistics line to get it there, and he doesn't
have an
>> unlimited budget.
>
> Sure, but invariably the cost of a defensive position ends up
being
> significantly higher than the cost of the weapons that attack it.
You bring X ship with Y weapons and Z hull/engines/FTL. I buy Xx10
Rock with tunnels and corridors dug through it, with Yx3 weapons
because I've not had to pay for Z Hull/engines/ftl and my orbital
platform will paste your ship in a given time because I can pump out
more fire per unit time with far more hull points because I didn't
have to pay for engines or ftl.
> Ah, but that requires the attacker to be in fixed location to be
hammered,
> and they don't have to do that. The attacker has the flexibility of
knowing
You're coming through one place. That means I can have lots of
weapons aimed at you. If you have to come through that place, then I
can hit you.
Again, lets go back to Gibraltar. You say you can fire shipboard
weapons against me. I however can launch longer legged aircraft with
more sensor fits onboard from a land based position and find you and
hit you long before you can launch your ship based weapons.
If we're nuke free, I figure out where you are roughly and paste your
taskforce with a few nukes in the area.
Since you have to attack from within a known envelope, unless I'm
sitting on my hands, I then plan my scouting and patrols to find you
before you get inside that known envelope and I hit you there. Since
I'm operating from a fixed base, I can have more defenses, more ammo,
more fuel and I can take the time to really protect/disperse it so
it'll be harder to destroy with small PGMs. And I can have reserve
assets father back that come in and help defend the primary point.
>
> to launch near the gate, you can just lob missiles through from long
> distances away or launch and leave. Really, the best bet is to send
your
> ships through and attack him before he attacks you. Of course, then
why
> bother building significant defenses? In the end, mobile forces are
just
> going to be more flexible and cost effective.
This works only if the defender is sitting on their hands asleep. Its
just like door entry into a house by police. If they're ready on the
drop, the defender will plug the first cops through the door. Usually
cops expect the first guy to go down. When cops play this out in
training with cops on the defense expecting the Breach, the first cop
or more through the door ALWAYS die. That usually screws-up the rest
of the entry because they're triping/stepping on their dead buddies
that are right at the doorway.
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Data Center Operations Group -
- http://web.turner.com/data_center/ -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill One CNN Center SE0813 E -
- Internet Technologies -- Data Center Operations Manager -
- Hours 11am - 7pm Mon - Fri (8Sdc, 10Sdc IT@3Ndc) -
- Cellular: 404-545-6205 e-mail: Ryan.Gill@cnn.com -
- Office: 404-588-6191 -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Emergency Power-off != Door release! -
----------------------------------------------------------------