Re: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:36:29 -0500
Subject: Re: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
At 12:17 AM -0500 1/25/05, Laserlight wrote:
> > The footage I see from Fallujah and its environs
>> seems to be about destroying the ability of the
>> enemy to fight. In fact theres an E5 Marine in
>> Tikrit that's wanting something more effective
>> than a 40mm grenade launcher when dealing with
>> walls and such where Haji's are shooting from
>> behind.
>
>So "I'm not shooting a missile at a guy -- I'm shooting a missile at
>hard cover which has at least one guy behind it."
That's because you don't have to hit the guy with
the missile. By virtue of my position at CNN, I
also saw some footage of a Palestinian that was
taking pot shots at an Isreali M60. After a few
shots from the same place the M60 TC wearied of
the pot shots. So they put an HE round (HEAT?)
around 5-10 feet in front of the soldier at his
feet. The footage frame by frame showing the
tracer element screech across the screen, impact,
bloom and then obscure the very daft gunman in a
screen of smoke and debris.
Overall, you're putting the round on a point, not
on a trooper (more or less). In that case, I'd
expect the GMS/P guidance system to have a second
mode for engaging a given point of ground as
opposed to a heat source/contrasting object.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------