RE: Philosophy/Design of SF War Games

Thanks to John and Glenn for the backup on this point:

--- "John K. Lerchey" <lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> Likewise, replies inline.
> 
> --On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:54 AM +1000
> "Robertson, Brendan" 
> <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> 
> > Replies inline:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Brian B [mailto:greywanderer987@yahoo.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 7:06 AM
> >>
> >> 5. PDS that can engage incoming MDC/HKP/HVC/SLAM
> >> attacks.
> >
> > That's already subsumed into the attack roll
> mechanics.
> >
> 
> Um... no it isn't.  The direct fire attack rules
> give you an attack die 
> based on FCS vs the targets aspect.  The missile
> attack rules give you an 
> attack die based on the missiles targeting system,
> but the defender gets an 
> explicit ECM roll *AND* a PDS roll *if* it has PDS. 
> Even with PDS systems, 
> you do NOT get the second die vs MDC/HKP/HVC/SLAM
> attacks.

Although you should.

=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."

- Anonymous

		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail