Prev: RE: Concept: mass and mass Next: Question on Wave Gun from More Thrust

Re: UNSC beta and FB3

From: DOCAgren@a...
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:23:00 EST
Subject: Re: UNSC beta and FB3


In a message dated 3/14/04 2:00:48 AM, 
owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU writes:

<< From: Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org>
Subject: Re: UNSC beta and FB3

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:57:28AM -0500, DOCAgren@aol.com wrote:
>I have a question,
>If you have a ship when designed that has less the 4 hull rows, like
many of 
>the smaller navy vessal, Scout and Corvettes, will it change the cost
of 
these?

See Oerjan's post at
http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200403/msg00192.html. In short, yes; if
you only _have_ 3 or fewer hull rows because you don't have enough boxes
to put one in the others, you ought to pay for it.

Roger >>

Which will force a redesign some of the of the canon Scout and
Corvettes.  
I'm almost wondering if there should not be a Mass 10 cut off where
under which 
the penalty for having less than 4 hull boxes isn't applied.

Have a Good One,

ME

Prev: RE: Concept: mass and mass Next: Question on Wave Gun from More Thrust