Re: Rant Warning below

Indy wrote:

> Pretty much, yeah. And JMS even stated in one of his posts that
> he thought "destroyer" sounded neater than "cruiser" (after all,
> it's meant to *destroy*, not *cruise*).

He's got a point. What he doesn't know is that "destroyer" originally
came from the term "torpedo boat destroyer", a ship designed at the turn
of the 20th Century to take on torpedo boats (and also carry out many of
the same functions as a torpedo boat). Eventually it was just shortened
to "destroyer".

--
Allan Goodall		   agoodall@att.net
http://www.hyperbear.com   agoodall@hyperbear.com
> Roger Burton West wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:08:46AM -0600, Doug Evans wrote:
> > 
> > >Natch, in B5, where the largest ship the
> > >humans have is a 'destroyer', it's obvious, you can get away with
fudge.
> > 
> > My understanding is that Straczynski and Ellison intended to use
naval
> > terms, but didn't actually know them well enough to use them
correctly
> > and didn't bother to hire an advisor.
> 
> Pretty much, yeah. And JMS even stated in one of his posts that
> he thought "destroyer" sounded neater than "cruiser" (after all,
> it's meant to *destroy*, not *cruise*).
> 
> Mk