Prev: Re: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS Next: Re: [FT] Yet Another Fighters Suggestion

RE: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:43:26 +1100
Subject: RE: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS

It's probably best being abstracted into the Torpedo fighter rules;
Noam's shipyard has a few variations (can't remember the site address).

You have to carefully balance the mass of the weapon system loaded onto
the
fighter with the normal ship mass+firecon.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bail9672@bellsouth.net [SMTP:bail9672@bellsouth.net]
> 
> Small ships do need to have some punch.  The Kra'vak MKP weapon is
> pretty potent, but being a one-shot weapon it has really limited
> usefulness.  Now why don't fighters have these?  Hmm, could that be a
> Kar'vak torpedo fighter? hmmm, never thought of that... anyway...
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> 
IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for 
viruses and defects.  2. This e-mail (including any 
attachments) may contain confidential information for the 
use of the intended recipient.	3. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please: contact the sender by return
e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and 
delete and destroy all copies of this e-mail.  4. Any views 
expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated. 
5. Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any 
other readers are aware of these restrictions.

Prev: Re: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS Next: Re: [FT] Yet Another Fighters Suggestion