Re: [SG,DS] Power Armour Weapon
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:16:54 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG,DS] Power Armour Weapon
At 5:07 PM -0600 3/10/03, staremu wrote:
>Yes, but with futuristic weapons using futuristic materials, given a
normal
>battle length and the ammount of long-burst firing that any gunner will
be
>throwign out, is it really worth the fuss. I thought wwater-coolign
was one
>of those things developed for when the primary use of an MG was for
sweeping
>open fields and defense. Modern SAW tactics don't really call for
extended
>burst fire, do they? Another thing to consider is that a coolign
system is
>just one more thing to break down.
Consider human wave tactics and the need to kill lots of creatures
before they get to you and mob you down. Like I said in the other
posting, I'll bet the US troops in Korea were wishing for their water
cooled M1919s. Barrel changes were less of an issue with water cooled
Guns.
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '43 Humber MkIV (1/2)
----------------------------------------------------------