Prev: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery Next: Re: Re: Bugs, usted to be Wolfman's grav tank model

RE: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery

From: "laserlight@q..." <laserlight@quixnet.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 13:25:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery

> So the US leadership actually paid attention and didn't let their men
> get used as replacements like the other two allies wanted them to be
> used. As more cannon fodder for their high commanders.

Derk:
>True. On the other hand, I think making the required changes is a LOT
easier when you're not already in there up to the neck.

"Each year, roll 1 die.  On a 1-4, your doctrine remains the same, no
matter how bad the results are or how obviously wrong it is to you, the
wargamer who has 50+ years worth of hindsight.	On a 5-6, you are
permitted to change the doctrine to better suit reality.  DRM -1 if your
generals are appointed on the basis of political connections or
inherited office.  DRM -1 if you have already changed doctrine within
the last 10 years."

It is very easy to have the attitude "This worked last time..."  
It would be interesting to see how often the winner of War #1 turns out
to be the loser, at least for the first couple of years, of War#2.  (not
necessarily WWI and II).

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at


Prev: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery Next: Re: Re: Bugs, usted to be Wolfman's grav tank model