Prev: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery Next: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery

Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 02:35:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery

At 6:41 PM -0700 5/27/02, John Atkinson wrote:
>
>2 weeks less than did the defenses of Poland, a
>country surrounded on every side but the north, with
>an army less than a quarter the size of the French
>one, with no medium or heavy tanks, a tiny and
>outdated airforce, and the Russians invading from the
>East.

Poland also didn't have an ally with expeditionary forces in country 
to help stem the tide of enemy advances.

>Of course, the Poles had fighting spirit and that
>counts for much more than heavy tanks and static
>fortresses.

Well, had the poles had the heavy tanks and static fortresses on one 
of the fronts, they'd probably have really made the russians and 
germans hurt far more than they did.
-- 
--
Ryan Gill		  rmgill@mindspring.com
	 |	  |
	 | O--=-  |		|	    |
	 |_/|o|_\_|		| _________ |
	 / 00DA61 \		|/---------\|
      _w/^=_[__]_= \w_		// [_]	o[]\\
     |: O(4) ==    O :|        _Oo\=======/_O_
     |---\________/---|        [__O_______W__] 
      |~|\	  /|~|	       |~|/BSV 575\|~|
      |~|=\______/=|~|	       |~|=|_____|=|~|
      |~|	   |~|	       |~|	   |~|


Prev: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery Next: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery