RE: [FT] Fighter combat

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf
> Of Charles Taylor
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 12:18 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: RE: [FT] Fighter combat
>
>
> In message
> <LPBBKBCFNDINFCDLIANGMEDHCPAA.alfie.finch@btinternet.com>
>	    "Alfie Finch" <alfie.finch@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > It does raise the question of why were the fighter endurance
> > rules changed in the first place ? In MT the rules were ;
> >
>SNIP<
> >
> > I agree with the removal on the time limit to
> return to carrier
> > after CEF is used up, but there must have been some
> reason why
> > CEF was increased from 3 to 6 in the first place ?
> > >
> > >SNIP<
> > >
> >
> >
> I _think_ fighters were given extra endurance to
> enable them to make use
> of the secondary movement rule introduced in Fleet Book 1.
>
Sorry, I was a bit obtuse there, wasn't I :)

What I was trying to bring up for consideration was if we're
talking about proposed changes to the CEF rules then I think we
need to consider why CEF was increased in the first place and