Prev: Re: Fighters options please Next: Re: For Beth

RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 13:51:37 -0400
Subject: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

At 12:39 PM -0400 5/9/02, laserlight@quixnet.net wrote:
>
>As a couple other for-instances:
>Mass 15, 2 hull, MD2, FTL, 1 hanger =54 points + fighters = 72/1 = 72

Hey it's a fighter transporter/lighter....

>Mass 258, 26 hull. MD2, FTL, 20 hangers= 954 + fighters = 1314/20= 65.7

Not that much cheaper. Now. Make a carrier that can either defend 
itself or can run faster than your typical SDN or BB. (ie Thrust 5 or 
6)

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	 

Prev: Re: Fighters options please Next: Re: For Beth