Prev: Thougth's on Fighters and PDAF... Next: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

From: "Alan and Carmel Brain" <aebrain@w...>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 00:08:24 +1000
Subject: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

From: "Charles Taylor" <nerik@monkslode.fsnet.co.uk>

> Ok, Take a standard fighter group, costs 18 points.
> To carry it requires a hanger, 9 MASS and 27 points.
> 
> The hanger has a points cost 50% greater than the fighter group it
holds
> (not counting the MASS it takes up)

Deck crews, spare ordnance, fuel - which survives after the fighters
have gone bye-bye.

A hanger that cannot launch, recover, re-arm or do anything other than


Prev: Thougth's on Fighters and PDAF... Next: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!