Prev: Laserlight's post Next: Re: FB designs & fighters

RE: Re: Fighters

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:19:17 -0700
Subject: RE: Re: Fighters

>From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>

>What it really sounds like is that the Ship construction rules for
>Carriers needs to be revised.
>
>No instant launches of all fighters. Carriers must have at least
>average hulls for the cats to function with a corresponding decrease
>of strength given a higher Delta V from the engines. Break out
>separate launching and recovery facilities for carriers from the 1.5
>mass of the fighter bay and points cost.
>
>Fiddle with this more and your problem of soap bubble carriers washes
away.

Hmmmmm....

Not sure I agree with this.  Not sure I disagree, either.  However, it
is 
ironic that this brings us back to my original question about connecting

multiple fighter bays to 1 ops deck (launch/recovery system).

3B^2

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 


Prev: Laserlight's post Next: Re: FB designs & fighters